Funny! You could have just said: "Women leave.", period. 😄

Didn't she announce it beforehand? I remember her mentioning something about not having a show last week...

Well... It has to happen first before you can remember, though, doesn't it? 🤔

"Video os not available with your current subscription plan"

Very useful, yes - when it comes to rhe descriptions...

However - I would even argue that almost every girl on the chart is rated one spot to high. And I wouldn't even consider myself particularly picky or overcritical...

So if I analyse the language, the entitlement is already obvious.

I mean, if you take it litterally this statement almost means that the man has to pay for asking a woman out even without the actual date taking place...

But even that set aside, a man "does not have to" pay, there's no law or anything...

So now, it's still debatable, however, if he SHOULD. That's where the discussion is normally supposed to start, depending on the woman's and the man's expectations and so on and so forth.

And that's also where the lady can have her own and say that a man has to pay for HIM going out on a date with HER specifically...

But the way this lady is phrasing it (if she so did), speaks once again to the entitlement underneath...

...just kidding.

You're just being insecure!

It does now... Thank you!

Thx for fixing it!