Sorted by
Latest activity Popular Newest posts
October 03

paid £10 for sub none of the videos are working 

2
October 07
• Edited (Oct 07, 2025)

Another interesting topic…how will AI effect relationships…will men turn to AI over women? Thoughts?

October 07

Idea for an episode: Dive into the topic of Work Wives. I have always felt like it is a step from cheating…always spending so much time with a co-worker.

2
 
October 06

BONNIE BLUE vs NALA RAY will absolutely break the internet…

Change my mind

1
October 05

Guest suggestion for a show: Darius M. Think he's out of Hotlanta, GA.

March 17

If your Only Fans crush, refuses to meet up for a date, should men be entitled to a refund?

July 06

My simping buddy man!

September 05

Show Idea for Pearl: Interview Professional Matchmakers & see what they have to say. I’m thinking about going this route to save time, money & energy.

September 25

I'm listening to The Kenzie debate right now.  Pearl, let me say real quick,  I am "prolife" and I don't think women are going to reverse the abortion trend they're on and it will prove disastrous for our society. 

That said, I want to impress upon you that Kenzie won that debate. The reason being that,  in short,  she is cold and calculated on the topic at hand. She's in the debate to win. 

I sense that you hold emotion towards the topic that you try hard to mask but it still comes through.  In these instances,  I think you'd do well to be as cold and detached as Kenzie is towards the topic. 

If you listen back to the debate, I believe that you'll find that she's very skilled in getting you on the back foot. Folks, like Destiny for example, are good at that. It's very much a part of their strategy.  She dictates the pace of the debate. In a way, the conversation starts to resemble her interviewing you. 

I think and I suggest for your consideration to become cold and detached.  To set the pace.  Concentrate, perhaps, on interviewing her. 

For example,  one that I recall,  you remember when you brought up late term abortion and ripping a fully formed baby limb from limb. 

She said that doesn't happen.  Which,  of course, in some instances it surely does happen.  

Acting as though you're interviewing her you might say something like, "Hypothetically, let's say as part of a late term abortion the doctor did have to rip the baby apart,  limb from limb.  Do you think that would be a bit gruesome?"

She'd probably say, "It's not a baby.  It's a fetus."

"Sure. It's a fetus." You could say.  "Do you think that it would be a bit gruesome if the doctor ripped off its limbs or crushed it skull or something like that? Would that be gruesome to you? "

She would deny it happens again and you don't even have to respond.  Just look at the camera. We all know this happens.  She's denying reality. 

You are interviewing her.  Not the other way around.  She needs to struggle to explain her stances.  Not you.  Have her on the back foot. You set the pace. These liberal women are cold and calculated.  The ones that can articulate use these methods.  Best wishes, Pearl. I plan to continue supporting your efforts. 

1
September 28

The Chad nowadays could be held accountable for retroactive child support.  In the past it seems that women forgive the chad and go for the beta bucks deluxe deal.  With DNA paternity on the horizon now the betas can stand up and not financially children that are not theirs.  However it’s a long fight of legislation to have paternity at birth.  Sorry i can’t articulate this one.   

3