Wait a minute... So do we have to join yet another website to get the content we were promised, if we were to join the audacity network???

I'm getting the usual "not available with current subscription" message as so often...

Also, shouldn't there be more videos in the meantime, line the one of Shiv and of PI Russ?

Well, Andrew is known to be an excellent debater so maybe Pearl was a little nervous and too eagerly focussed on winning the argument and getting some kind of upper hand - instead of keeping it productive and actively engaging in some of Andrews takes...

However, is it really a reason to cancel the membership? I mean, it was just a debate after all and Andrew said it himself: no hard feelings...

Also, Pearl had a few valid points in her own right.

I feel you. Asking any kind of support-team or anything for help (or trying to report a problem in the account section for that matter) hasn't taken me very far either...

However, in my experience DougMPA has always been quite helpful with technical issues, occasionally getting personally involved - in spite of not being part of the technical support team to my knowledge...

Didn't she announce it beforehand? I remember her mentioning something about not having a show last week...

Well... It has to happen first before you can remember, though, doesn't it? 🤔

"Video os not available with your current subscription plan"

Very useful, yes - when it comes to rhe descriptions...

However - I would even argue that almost every girl on the chart is rated one spot to high. And I wouldn't even consider myself particularly picky or overcritical...

So if I analyse the language, the entitlement is already obvious.

I mean, if you take it litterally this statement almost means that the man has to pay for asking a woman out even without the actual date taking place...

But even that set aside, a man "does not have to" pay, there's no law or anything...

So now, it's still debatable, however, if he SHOULD. That's where the discussion is normally supposed to start, depending on the woman's and the man's expectations and so on and so forth.

And that's also where the lady can have her own and say that a man has to pay for HIM going out on a date with HER specifically...

But the way this lady is phrasing it (if she so did), speaks once again to the entitlement underneath...

...just kidding.