1:39:00 my ex ran off with another man and decided to take our 3 year old son with her.

A year later am I am still prevented from access or taking her to court as I’m awaiting paperwork.

Shocking.

I want 50% custody for my son… at the moment she’s chosen to remove his father from his life because she wanted a different dick… shocking

1:30:25 this girl really thinks she’s something, but she’s actually really low intelligence.

The ad hominem is so classic of women and the left. They believe in teaching the art of winning a debate over scrutiny of facts and reasoning.

1:29:15 thank you

1:20:40 the right compromises. The left relishes (and teaches) non-compromising at all points.

If one side traditionally gives up ground while the other refuses to; the midpoint will always favour the non-compromising party.

This is done by design.

Pearl’s solution is the best option.

The guest just can’t see beyond the only option which suits all her requirements.

1:18:00 there is only one person being reasonable here. The other has no problem with lying…

1:00:18 female CEOs out perform male? Same for kingdoms and empires.

As for everyone being safer under female rulership…? This guest really needs read some history (or is that Herstory?)

Mary, Anne, Mary, Elizbeth (England and Scotland)

That’s just a little island…

She’s quoting einsteins wife? Says it all.

Einestein is a known fraud.

Debates with women:

Her disagreement is usually sufficient to end your point.

No context or explaination required.

I’m bored of this guest using the word ‘nuance’.